Throughout the semester, a
requirement of LTED 618 was to keep a weekly blog journal where we reflected
upon the learned material as well as any new understandings and misunderstandings
of the class. Through keeping this blog entry, it helped us adhere to the
Student Learning Objectives found on page 1 of the class syllabus. The blog entries
had us transact with the text to further develop our understandings of the
material as well as a course. We were able to question and answer our
understandings. The weekly questions we responded to helped guide our
understandings of the material. In the following paragraphs, I will go through
and respond to each of the Student Learning Objectives.
“Students will gain knowledge and competency
with regards to the variety of genres that readers and writers use to
communicate.” Objective one was followed through in our weekly entries because we
often reflected upon the genres in our weekly writing. Many of entries talk
about wither my new understandings of the genres or how I am using them in my
classroom. Having to write about them also allowed me to assess what I knew
about the genres and what I still needed to know.
“Students
will gain knowledge and competency with regards to the role of purpose and
audience in writing and reading and the rhetorical voices used to address the
desired purpose(s) and audience(s).” Objective two was followed in our weekly
writings because we always had to remember who are audience is. While this is a
weekly blog entry, it was an informal entry where we wrote to ourselves. Our
voice and purpose were set to write to a specific audience, and that of our
professor. The end of the semester project, our multi genre projects, also
taught us voice, purpose, and audience. In those pieces we have to vary our
audience, purpose and our voice. Each piece requires us to use different
purposes and audiences. When writing I have to stay focused on the idea that I
may not be writing as myself and the audience is not the same as it was for the
last piece.
“Students
will gain knowledge and competency with regards to the historical and
contemporary theoretical models of reading and writing, including new literacy
theories of reading and writing.” The third objective was evident throughout
the course. In the beginning of the blog entries, we focused on the models of
reading and writing. We had to understand what writing was before we started learning
about the various genres. One important idea I took from the blog entries is
when I reassessed my views on revising and editing. I realized that they are
two separate stages and processes.
“Students
will gain knowledge and competency with regards to the relationship between the
writing and reading processes.” This relationship was known before I started
writing the weekly blog entries. This concept has been stressed since I took
LTED 600 where we learn that oral and written languages are both forms of
literacy. Through this course however, I learned more of the relation between
writing and reading process. Students will become more engaged as readers if
they are better writers. Even through my blog entries I became a better writer
and reader. The more I wrote, the more I read. Writing required me to transact with
the text for further understandings.
“Students
will gain knowledge and competency with regards to the role of metacognition in
writing proficiency and reading comprehension.” I am not exactly sure how
writing in the blog entries helped me become more aware of metacognition of
writing proficiency and reading comprehension. What the blog entries did though
was allow me to become more aware of teaching students different types of
writing and when to use these types of writings. Graphic organizers are
essential for writing and it is important to teach students how and hewn to use
them.
“Students
will gain knowledge and competency with regards to the types of reading and
writing assignments that are developmentally appropriate for learners,
including digital reading and writing assignments.” The class in general taught
me about the types of reading and writing assessments that are appropriate for leanings.
While reading Hicks (2009) I learned of the digital reading and writing assignments
I could assign for my students. Due to Hicks (2009) I created writing
assessments that were similar to what he had written about. In my second entry
I reflected on digital writing and explored my understandings of it as well as
what Hicks wrote about it. I like the idea of digital writing, especially using
blog entries as a form of expression. While I did not like always having to
write the blog entries, especially lengthy ones, it allowed me to reassess what
I knew and what I wanted to know. Perhaps in the future if I teach in a school
that assigns homework and my student population has access to computers outside
of school, I would consider have weekly blog entries for homework.
“Students will gain knowledge and
competency with regards to the role of writing assessment and evaluation in
determining student writing proficiency and reading comprehension.” I don’t
really remember writing too much about writing assessment to determine student
writing proficiency and reading comprehension. I do remember writing about
assessment in the beginning of the blog entries. Looking back on my blog
entries, entry 6 focused on assessing writing, when we went over Rubistar in
class. Through this blog entry I wrote about different forms of assessment and
when we should use them. I do not recall focusing too much on connecting assessment
to writing proficiency and reading comprehension. What my assessment entry was about
was when and how to assess students. To me informal assessment is more
important as it allows the students to get valuable feedback without the stress
of having their rough drafts graded. Assessments are meant to be meaningful so
we should tell students in advance when we are collecting a piece of writing to
be assessed.